Problem
Reviews can sound vague, repetitive or synthetic.
Loading
Preparing the page for you.
Preparing the page for you.
Review Checker
Reviews can sound vague, repetitive or synthetic. Review emotional repetition, concrete detail, sentiment balance and recommendation style.
Use the result to improve trust, clarity, professionalism and first impressions before the content reaches someone else.
Analysis workspace
Scan type
20-8,000 characters recommended for analysis.
Try an example
Specific product experience usually reads differently from generic praise.
Disclaimer: AI detection results are guidance only. No detector can prove authorship with certainty.
Analysis panel
Review authenticity cues, product-specific detail, sentiment balance, and generic claim patterns.
Insight preview
Repetitive praise
Looks for repeated positive wording without concrete detail.
Generic product claims
Checks whether claims could apply to many products.
Sentiment balance
Reviews whether sentiment feels realistic and proportionate.
Review specificity
Looks for dates, situations, product details, or lived experience.
Supported examples
Privacy reassurance
Submitted text is processed temporarily and is not stored in scan history.
Guidance-first reminder
Results are probabilistic guidance signals, not proof of authorship.
Report preview
Best for
What it checks
Repetitive praise, Generic product claims, Sentiment balance
Why it matters
Review authenticity cues before feedback influences trust, reputation, or moderation decisions.
Example outcomes
The report explains signal strength and practical review steps. It does not make absolute authorship claims.
Plain-language signals
Focused on outcomes users can understand quickly.
Reviews can sound vague, repetitive or synthetic.
Customers rely on reviews to make decisions, so low-authenticity wording can damage trust.
Review emotional repetition, concrete detail, sentiment balance and recommendation style.
Product reviews, Testimonials, Service feedback, Marketplace moderation.
Review whether the content creates the right impression for the audience.
Understand patterns that may make the content appear overly AI-generated.
Practical guidance
The checker helps you decide what to revise, clarify or verify before the content reaches an audience.
Results are written for real-world review. Look for ways to add context, make claims more specific, improve readability and reduce wording that may weaken trust.
Responsible answers for practical use.
It helps brands, marketplaces and moderators understand how review may be perceived before it is sent, published, submitted or trusted.
No. Results are guidance, not proof. Use them with context and human judgement.
Use the insights to improve authenticity, trust, clarity, professionalism and readability.
Content confidence
Get clear insights into authenticity, trust, clarity and AI writing patterns in seconds.
Privacy-first analysis
Review reports use safe metadata only. Submitted review text is not stored in scan history.
Review still benefits from context such as purchase history or platform signals.
Look for concrete product use, timing, and balanced sentiment.
Check whether the review includes real product experience.